Resources
Method context for disciplined valuation conversations.
SOTP
What it is: Values each business component independently, then combines them into a unified enterprise view.
When to use: Use when your company has distinct lines of business with different growth and margin profiles.
Limitations: Can become sensitive to segment assumptions and may overstate precision if segment data is weak.
Berkus
What it is: Applies early-stage qualitative checkpoints to estimate value before strong revenue history exists.
When to use: Use in pre-revenue and very early traction stages where future potential is clearer than financial history.
Limitations: Less grounded in hard revenue comparables and dependent on qualitative judgment discipline.
DCF
What it is: Discounts projected cash flows into present value using capital cost and terminal assumptions.
When to use: Use once operating data quality supports reasonable multi-year projection confidence.
Limitations: Highly sensitive to discount rate and terminal value assumptions.
EV/EBITDA
What it is: Uses earnings-based market multiples to anchor value to comparable company behavior.
When to use: Use when EBITDA quality and comparables are mature enough for meaningful benchmarking.
Limitations: Weak fit for earlier companies without stable EBITDA.
VC Method / Scorecard
What it is: Frames value through exit potential, return requirements, and stage-adjusted benchmark factors.
When to use: Use in venture fundraising contexts where pricing aligns to return profiles and peer stage ranges.
Limitations: Can underrepresent company-specific nuances if used in isolation.
How Beryl approaches valuation differently
Beryl does not treat valuation as a single-number exercise. It combines method logic, stage context, and narrative discipline so the output can be explained under investor scrutiny. The objective is not optimism; it is defensibility.